User blog comment:Førestation/Dog Breeds ( Big Dogs )/@comment-32043089-20161021203854

Hey! This is a really original idea and it's really cute~

Although, I have to say, a lot of the things said on this blogpost are completely off. They aren't backed up by facts. If you're going to write a really pretty blog post/rant about breeds of dogs, I would highly recommend you do it correctly. It also would  make it more professional if you could fix the many spelling errors throughout the blogpost.

--

Doberman's were actually not used to kill. They were used for military purposes and service in WWI  and WWII assisting various soliders detect explosives, wounded soilders, and detect enemy mines.

--

The German Shepherd part is semi-accurate, though, again, not backed up by correct knowledge.

--

As for the Pitbulls, you are correct. They were bred to fight.

Although, as you used as an example, Huskies and Boxers are actually known to be on the more dangerous side of the scale. I'm not saying there aren't good dogs of those breeds, every breed of dog is nice. It all depends on how the dog was raised, but not always. It's also in their genetics to act the way they do.

As you said: "No matter the classes you take, you will always be wrong saying Pitbulls are dangerous."

That is also extremely inaccurate, Pitbulls are in the top 6 most dangerous breeds out there. But, again, it depends on the genetics, how their ancestors were treated, and how that dog itself was raised.

You also stated how you think Pitbulls are  not    attack dogs, yet you stated above that they were bred to fight?

--

"Rottwehiler" is spelt like Rottweiler. I actually have one, and have had them my entire life.

I also am a little confused on why you compared dogs to "drug addicts" or "people in the hood" because they're actually nowhere near correlated whatsoever in ways of living?